View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Kanban |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Decision Making Option Framing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 60-120 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 4-10 | 1-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs |
Tagsno overlap | FlowVisual managementDelivery | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | ForecastingFlowDelivery | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison |