methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
A paper-based illustration representing WSJF with its core stages and visible working result.
Agile
WSJF
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen45-90 min1-2 h60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews3-104-123-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListRanked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay AssumptionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsOpportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds
Add more methods