View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Jobs to Be DoneArchitecture Decision RecordFailure Mode and Effects Analysis8D Problem Solving
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 15-45 min | 2-6 h | 1-6 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-3 | 3-10 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause |