View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Delivery Shape Up | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down | 10-20 min daily | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 2-4 pro Pitch | 1 | 6-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyServiceService design | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint |



