methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-3 h2-6 hMehrere Tage bis Wochen
Participantsdifferent
4-123-121-61-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanSystem Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation HypothesesSimulation Model, Scenario Reports
Tags1 shared
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
Add more methods