View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |