methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration of a decision table with criteria rows, weighted ratings, and a narrowly leading alternative.
Decision Making
Decision Matrix
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Trade-off Analysis.
Decision Making
Trade-off Analysis
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage45-90 min0.5-3 Tage45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
4-122-85-152-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanDecision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected OptionRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaTrade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted Downsides
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions
Add more methods