View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() DevOps Incident Command | ![]() Architecture Request for Comments | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Operations Runbook |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | As needed | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 1-2 Tage | 20-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-15 | 3-20 Reviewer | 1-4 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Incident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder Updates | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Runbook, Checklist, Escalation Path |
Tagsno overlap | IncidentOperationsReliability | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | OperationsReliabilityDocumentation |



