View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Growth North Star Metric |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 1-2 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-6 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |