methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Operations
RACI Matrix
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min1-3 h10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-82-82-81
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsRACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision NotesGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods