View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Innovation TRIZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 1-3 h | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity |