View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Ideal Days |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | 1-5 Tage | 5-20 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | Nutzertraffic | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | EstimationEffortRisk | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |