methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
15-60 min2-6 h5-20 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-93-103-203-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortAgile
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
EstimationEffortRisk
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods