methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of ICE Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
ICE Scoring
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Purposedifferent
When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min60-180 min1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-84-203-20 Reviewer2-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ICE Table, Top Idea ListCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesRFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or ticketsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log
Tags1 shared
PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
Add more methods