methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Three Amigos method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Three Amigos
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-30 min1-6 Wochen20-40 min pro Story
Participantsdifferent
2-834-103-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument NotesClarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanAcceptance Criteria, Story Update
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
Add more methods