View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic | 3-20 Reviewer | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |