View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Decision Making Cynefin Workshop | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-60 min | 60-180 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-9 | 4-20 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | EstimationEffortAgile | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | EstimationEffortRisk |



