methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-6 Wochen1-3 h1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-84-101-83-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods