View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Hypothesis-Driven TroubleshootingSoftware Architecture CanvasArchitecture Decision RecordConsensus Workshop
| Criterion |  Engineering Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-240 min | 1-2 h | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Hypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |