View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation How Might We |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |  Product Strategy OKRs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h Setup |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 2-6 | 3-8 | 2-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | KPI Tree, Owner List | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement |