View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation How Might We |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 10-20 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 3-6 | 4-100+ | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | KPI Tree, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement |