View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Hooked Model |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Growth North Star Metric |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Multiple workshops over several weeks | 5-15 min | 1-2 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 | 3-8 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics check | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | GrowthBehaviorRetention | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |