methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
A paper-based illustration representing Pirate Metrics (AARRR) with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
Pirate Metrics AARRR
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.For products with complex usage paths, overall growth alone is too coarse to reveal bottlenecks. Pirate Metrics breaks the relationship with the product into consecutive stages and shows where the funnel actually leaks.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend30 min Setup, dann laufend1-4 Wochen1-2 h Setup, laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-61-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone1-62-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardRAID Log, Status Report SourceExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryAARRR funnel, Metric baseline, Experiment backlog
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
GrowthMetricsExperiments
Add more methods