View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 h | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | KPI Tree, Owner List | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement | SensemakingDecisionRationale |