methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighHighLow
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend2-6 h1-6 Wochen15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-63-84-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
RiskRoot causeSafety
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods