View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:HEART FrameworkCustomer Journey CanvasArchitecture Inception CanvasSoftware Architecture Canvas
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research HEART Framework | ![]() UX Design Customer Journey Canvas | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas | ![]() Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |



