View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Golden Path |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams need a reliable default path for frequent use, sprawl quickly emerges without any guiding logic. Golden Path bundles the preferred path so good practice becomes easy and deviation becomes deliberate. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage Setup, laufend | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-12 | 3-15 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Golden Path Guide, Templates, Quality Checks | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | EngineeringProductivityGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |