Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Golden Path Architecture Decision Record Fake Door Test ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)

Criterion	Engineering Golden Path	Architecture Architecture Decision Record	Product Discovery Fake Door Test	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)
Purposedifferent	When teams need a reliable default path for frequent use, sprawl quickly emerges without any guiding logic. Golden Path bundles the preferred path so good practice becomes easy and deviation becomes deliberate.	An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.	When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium
Timedifferent	1-3 Tage Setup, laufend	15-45 min	1-5 Tage	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional
Participantsdifferent	2-8	1-3	Nutzertraffic	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Async	Async	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Golden Path Guide, Templates, Quality Checks	ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale	Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions
Tagsno overlap	EngineeringProductivityGovernance	ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance	ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks

Add more methods