methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Golden Circle
Growth
Golden Circle
Paper illustration of Team Topologies Interaction Modes with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Topologies Interaction Modes
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement.When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 minHalf day45-90 minHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-8Team-Leads plus Architecture3-12Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning DraftInteraction Heat Map, Agreements per PairExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
MarketingPositioningCommunication
TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods