methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Golden Circle
Growth
Golden Circle
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Purposedifferent
In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 minHalf day initial, dann laufend15-45 min20-40 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-8Ein Team plus Stakeholder1-83-15
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning DraftTeam API DocumentPERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk NotesROAM Board, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
MarketingPositioningCommunication
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Add more methods