methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Golden Circle
Growth
Golden Circle
Paper illustration of Specification by Example with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Specification by Example
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement.When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min60-90 min pro Feature20-40 min initial, dann laufendHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-83-63-15Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning DraftExample Table, Acceptance TestsROAM Board, Owner ListTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
MarketingPositioningCommunication
AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods