View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Golden CircleSpecification by ExampleArchitecture Decision RecordArchitecture Communication Canvas
| Criterion |  Growth Golden Circle |  Agile Specification by Example |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 15-45 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |