methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Golden Circle
Growth
Golden Circle
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Purposedifferent
In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min20-40 min initial, dann laufendHalf day initial, dann laufend2-5 min je Item
Participantsdifferent
1-83-15Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-9
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning DraftROAM Board, Owner ListTeam API DocumentRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates
Tagsno overlap
MarketingPositioningCommunication
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
Add more methods