methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Golden Circle
Growth
Golden Circle
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min120 min initial, dann laufend15-45 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-83-61-31-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning DraftHEART-GSM Table, DashboardADR File, Decision Log, RationaleContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
MarketingPositioningCommunication
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods