View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Golden Circle |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 20-40 min pro Story | Half day initial, dann laufend | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-6 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Team API Document | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |