View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-2 h | 45-60 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | KPI Tree, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement |