View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |  Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | 1-3 h | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 20–45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-6 | Small cross-functional group |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log |
Tagsno overlap | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | FailureResilienceRisk | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning |