methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Goal30–60 min1-6 Wochen15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-84-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsEmpathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods