View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-120 min | 20-45 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 1-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | LeanObservationProcessOperations | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |