methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h0.5-2 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-104-122-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsFive Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic Options
Tags1 shared
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
StrategyMarketAnalysis
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
StrategyCompetitionMarket
Add more methods