View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Engineering Kanban |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Ongoing | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-12 | 3-10 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | FlowVisual managementDelivery | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | ForecastingFlowDelivery |