methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h2-6 hMehrere Tage bis Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-82-81-61-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesContext Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary NotesStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation HypothesesSimulation Model, Scenario Reports
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
Add more methods