View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  DevOps Game Day |  Operations Visual Management |  Operations MORT Analysis |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag | Ongoing | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 1-20 | 2-6 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | ResilienceOperationsIncident | SignalsOperationsVisual management | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |