methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Operations
RACI Matrix
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag45-90 min45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-203-102-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsRACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision NotesDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods