methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Failure Scenario Analysis.
Engineering
Failure Scenario Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag1-3 h1-3 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
5-203-82-82-6
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksFailure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response ActionsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, CountermeasuresRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
FailureResilienceRisk
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods