methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Futures Wheel with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Futures Wheel
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
Purposedifferent
The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
60-120 min2-6 h1-3 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-103-83-82-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic SignalsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasBottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresIceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ForesightSystems thinkingSignals
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
FlowMeasurementConstraints
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
Add more methods