methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h1-2 h1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
1-55-303-101-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods