methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-6 Wochen60-90 min1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
1-54-104-101-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods