methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
HighHighLowLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h0.5-2 Tage15-30 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-106-122-62-8
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsService Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership MapRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods