methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
2-6 h30-60 min45–75 min1-6 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
3-103-10Team members involved4-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Add more methods